Isaac Newton's "inertia" simply does not exist. In short, Newton's "inertia" is imaginary. While Newton did make an effort to define his misunderstanding of "inertia", I find it curious that seldom if ever did he use "inertia" as a component in the explanation of the hundreds of events he described in his various works. Perhaps he included his "inertia" definition in PRINCIPIA due to his feeling pressured by a general expectation as to a "cause" for an object's uniform motion. That might explain Newton's ironic choice of words when he referred to "inertia" as the "force of inactivity" as if he thought a forceful "cause" was needed for the maintenance of a uniformly moving object's causeless default state of inactive rest-motion.
Is Galileo Galilei the Father of Inertia?
Physics authors often refer to Galileo as originating the concept of inertia. Curiously I have found no mention of any such concept within Galileo's many works. What I have found is that Galileo clearly recognized that in the absence of an acceleration/Action force, an object has no choice but to continue on with its motion unchanged. In the words of Professor Stillman Drake, a noted authority on the life and work of Galileo, "Galileo never asserted any vis inertiae or "force of inactivity" as Newton did." In his discussion of the issue, Drake went on to say "Many blame Galileo for his inability to invent inertia-..." Now that we see that "inertia" does not exist, we are free to recognize it is to Galileo's credit that he had no part in imaginary "inertia's" invention [3].
http://www.physicsnews1.com/article%20PR1.html
"The Authority Principle : In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.
Galileo Galilei - 1626
The Acceptance Principle : No concept shall attain acceptance without firm and logical support nor retain that acceptance after the loss of such support.
The Confusion Principle : The more complex and confusing the solution, the less likely it will face proper challenge and the more likely it will one day be proven incorrect.
The Lost-Logic Principle : Once an illogical concept is accepted within a science as true, the science itself becomes illogical. As long as the original illogical concept is retained, it is not possible to restore logic to the science as a whole since future concepts accepted within the science must be equally illogical to remain compatible with the original. Thus logic and progress become forever lost to the science until such time as all illogical concepts, including the original, are correctly identified and set aside.
The Common-Sense Principle : If the repeated professions of others in support of some cause are insufficient in helping you to improve your understanding and thereby upgrade the logic that forms the basis of your common sense, then accept their professions as evidence that they are insufficient to affect the advance of their cause beyond the starting-gate status of a theory.
The Homocentric Principle : Man's desire to describe the Universe in terms agreeable with his vision of his own existence as being central to all that exists, knows no bounds.
The False-Truth Principle : Acceptance of even one false concept as true, effectively blinds one's mind to recognition and acceptance of a wide range of related concepts that actually are true.
The Advancement Principle : The advancement of physics always involves the destruction of the majority opinion. Samuel Ting - 2003
http://www.physicsnews1.com/
Zarkov's Seek Principle : Seek those of like mind, do not try to convert anyone. When in hostile company, say your piece quietly then withdraw.
Zarkov's Test Principle : Learn to think for yourself when in the realm of science....... especially ignore those that claim knowledge and when asked to show it, anger and ridicule is presented.
Zarkov's Active Principle : Remember trust no one.... and do not give away gems freely..... it is a beautiful world, but remember many hearts are ugly.
Pythagoras was right !!!!!
Seek, Test and be Active.